Sentence examples for relationships were determined from inspiring English sources

Genetic relationships were determined by PFGE, and isolates were screened for selected resistance determinants.

Sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega30 and phylogenetic relationships were determined with MrBayes31.

Poorly aligned sections were deleted and phylogenetic relationships were determined using MrBayes v3.1.2 (ref. 58) after model selection in Topali59.

To clarify the structural requirement for inhibition, some structure activity relationships were determined.

Statistically significant relationships were determined using Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a probability (p) value < 0.05 being the statistical significance considered.

Stress strain relationships were determined by tensile tests with 8 coupons cut from extruded flanges and web.

Structure-activity relationships were determined by the cellular uptake of siRNA and the knockdown efficiency at mRNA and protein levels.

In vitro COX-1/COX-2 strelationshipsity relationships were determined by varying the substituents on the C-7 and C-8 quinoline ring.

In vitro COX-1/COX-2 strelationshipsity relationships were determined by varying the substituents on the C-4 quinoline ring.

The above indices along with raw reflectance and reflectance derivatives were examined for linear relationship with the ground-measured variables and the strongest relationships were determined.

In vitro COX-1/COX-2 strelationshipsity relationships were determined by varying the substituents on the C-3 propenone moiety.