Multiple semantic relationship types may share structural relationship types, as IS-A, Ownership, Part-of, Reference,...
Then each model's relationship types are extracted from the graph.
There are many issues to consider: For example, some relationship types are more profitable than others.
We've also identified a number of relationship types, complete with the rules each type implies.
We may want to follow Sowa in keeping the number of relationship types constrained.
They aren't aware of the variety of relationship types and don't understand what kind their customers want.
Again, the mapping of SKC relationship types to relationships employed in various ontologies will differ in various autonomous domains.
Current scheduling software allows the scheduler to define a variety of relationship types between activities.
You can filter relationship types 'on' and 'off' in the bottom left and also rollover and click on different players to get a clarified view.
A set of mappings are given that focus on accurately identifying such elements as relationship types, multiplicities, and aggregation semantics.
In addition, the N.S.A. correlates 164 "relationship types" to build social networks and what the agency calls "community of interest" profiles, using queries like "travelsWith, hasFather, sentForumMessage, employs".
