Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
So a 'definite' relation need not be a 'special' relation.
The actual form of the constitutive relation need not to be known a priori.
Bisimulation is a weaker notion than isomorphism (a bisimulation relation need not be 1-1), but it is sufficient to guarantee equivalence in processing.
At the same time, because they are not pursuing the expressivist semantic program the expression relation need not be exactly what ordinary expressivists take it to be.
If this is right, constructionists who view construction as a constitutive relation need another account of constitutivity: it is implausible and inconsistent to claim that the necessity arises out of concept or word meanings in cases of covert construction.
Such directedness of Fw allows for 'incomparability', so that the similarity relation needn't be linear.
Similar(54)
It is already apparent both that holism and nonseparability are related notions and that their exact relation needs to be clarified.
Although this relation is obviously a good deal more intimate than that between angels and gravitation, it is unclear how intimate the relation needs to be in order to ensure that functional properties play some useful explanatory role.
The ternary accessibility relation needs a philosophical interpretation in order to give relevant implication a real meaning on this semantics.
Indeed, the functional relation needs to be evaluated for a specific energy model input and relevant data.
However, the relation needs to be considered as intra-stratal due to the fact that the relation is between different meanings in semantics.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com