relation for more

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "relation for more" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear when this phrase could be used due to its lack of grammatical structure and clarity. Example: "The relation for more information is unclear."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Mirzoev [16] was the first who paid detailed attention to such relation (for more details about the calculation of the norms of intermediate derivatives operators, see [17]).

Boundary Value Problems

To examine the relation for more extreme categories of protein intake with GWG, we used low (<12%) and high (>20%) cut-off points based on the population distribution.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The Yale historian John Lewis Gaddis has been writing about Soviet-US diplomatic relations for more than 30 years.

The Guardian - Books

Mr. Charney was involved in public relations for more than a decade.

The New York Times - Arts

The Holy See and Iran have had full diplomatic relations for more than 50 years.

The New York Times

The Swiss represent American interests in Iran, since the United States and Iran have not had diplomatic relations for more than three decades.

The New York Times

Tong Kim, who has worked in US-Korea diplomatic relations for more than 25 years, says this is partly because international sanctions often isolate North Koreans even more.

The Guardian

This shared destiny has led to a rare truce between the two nations, which have had no bilateral relations for more than 50 years.

The New York Times - Science

MD Jo Gilham has worked in public relations for more than a decade and firmly believes that success for startups lies in working within a familiar sector, utilising industry contacts with whom you've a good reputation.

The Guardian

This stricture has echoes of the infamous Platt Amendment of 1901, which gave the United States broad rights to intervene in Cuba but which poisoned Cuban-American relations for more than 30 years.

The New York Times

In this way, the geometric matrix [8] was extended to consider for the first time relations for more than two atoms.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "relation for more" due to its poor grammatical structure. Instead, opt for clearer alternatives like "link for more information" or "relationship for more details".

Common error

Don't use "relation for more" as a substitute for phrases that clearly indicate a connection to additional information. This construction is non-idiomatic and will confuse readers. Instead choose alternatives like "link for more" or "information regarding" to enhance clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "relation for more" functions as an incomplete connector, attempting to link a concept with a desire for further information. However, it lacks grammatical correctness and clarity, as noted by Ludwig AI. Proper alternatives should be used to improve comprehensibility.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "relation for more" is grammatically incorrect and is not recommended for use in formal writing. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase lacks clarity and a logical structure. While a few examples appear in scientific and news-related contexts, it's best to replace it with clearer, more grammatically sound alternatives such as "link for more information" or "relationship for more details". These alternatives provide a more effective and professional way to connect information and indicate the availability of additional details. The usage of "relation for more" is rare, and therefore should be avoided in formal contexts. Use more grammatically correct alternatives such as: "connection for further information" or "for further details".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

relationship for more details

Focuses on a specific connection or association where further information is available.

connection for further information

Highlights a link to additional data or explanations.

link for more information

Emphasizes a direct pathway to obtain extra details.

reference for more details

Suggests consulting a specific source for additional information.

consideration for further aspects

Implies a deeper examination or broader range of factors.

exploration for additional facets

Indicates an investigation into different components or perspectives.

investigation for greater understanding

Points to a process aimed at achieving enhanced comprehension.

study for more insight

Suggests reviewing research to get an advanced awareness of a subject.

analysis for expanded view

Underlines the examination of data for a wider, more exhaustive perspective.

elaboration for enhanced perspective

Suggests giving more details to enrich someone's knowledge of a topic.

FAQs

How can I properly indicate a connection to further information?

Instead of using the awkward phrase "relation for more", use clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives such as "link for more information", "relationship for more details", or "connection for additional data".

What are some alternatives to "relation for more" in academic writing?

In academic contexts, it's best to use precise and formal language. Replace "relation for more" with phrases like "for further elaboration", "refer to [source] for additional details", or "see the following section".

Is "relation for more" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "relation for more" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It lacks a clear and logical structure, making it difficult to understand. It's recommended to use alternative phrases that are grammatically sound and convey the intended meaning effectively.

Which is better, "relation for more" or "relationship for more details"?

"Relationship for more details" is significantly better than "relation for more" because it uses the noun "relationship" which indicates a clear connection, and specifies that you're seeking "more details", offering clarity that the original phrase lacks.