"related arguments" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when discussing multiple arguments that are connected or relevant to each other in some way. For example: - The essay presented three related arguments to support the author's main thesis. - The researchers found several related arguments in support of their hypothesis. - The panel of experts debated the different related arguments surrounding the issue. - The lawyer presented a series of related arguments to convince the jury of her client's innocence.
Scotus uses different, but related, arguments to investigate modal questions such as that of the contingency of the present.
We contest related arguments that language is not an adaptation, namely that it is "perfect," non-redundant, unusable in any partial form, and badly designed for communication.
While he left significant room in precisely how one might interpret the theory, the core of Everett's interpretation involved four closely related arguments.
Grosseteste's response to the conflict between divine foreknowledge and free decision and related arguments therefore has two parts: first, the claim that there is a distinct family of modal notions in respect of which future events and true propositions about them may be contingent; second, the claim that freedom requires only this kind of contingency.
Here's a bunch of dance related arguments that you don't actually have to care about.
Ciliates, however, do not have males, and therefore no such two-fold cost of sex; nor do related arguments based on the costs of anisogamy and allocation of parental resources apply.
An intimately related argument is that collapsing filler identifications with lineup rejections ignores "filler siphoning".
A closely related argument holds that we can conceive of a pair of worlds in which some pair of spheres has been replaced by some other pair of spheres.
Leaders of some Muslim countries have a different but related argument.
One exegetical complication is that Levine himself now denies P1, while continuing to maintain the existence of the explanatory gap on the basis of an argument related to Argument D, although somewhat more complicated (2001, Ch. 3).
The argument is clearly related to arguments from practicality against rationalism (see the Anti-Rationalism Supplement), but the second premise and the conclusion are about moral judgments themselves rather than about the processes that result in moral judgment.
