Sentence examples for relate to methodological differences from inspiring English sources

The discrepancies between these studies may well relate to methodological differences, but leave unanswered questions about platelet filopodia formation and have fed debate in the field about the best strategy for generation of platelet-specific conditional knockout mice [ 74].

Another possibility may relate to methodological differences in either the laboratory culture of JEV or the serological assays or both, although this is not apparent in the case of one of these studies as the same assay and some of the same viruses were used [ 20].

We found that NKp46 expression, based on MFI, formed a single population (rather than two discrete high and low subpopulations) in 40% of our cohort, which may relate to methodological differences between the studies (see supplementary figure S6A, available online only).

The wide range of prevalence rates in these studies might be related to methodological differences between the studies, discrepancies in the application of criteria in different languages, differences in sociocultural backgrounds, and genetic factors.

Several studies have been conducted to assess the influence of haplotypes on the clinical response to methadone, with contradictory findings, probably related to methodological differences (methadone formulations, treatment duration and previous exposure to methadone) [15].

We do not know if the longer duration of the antibody response in Argentinean patients is supported by the continuous antigen re-stimulation, or if it is related to methodological differences in the used assays.

Though both the hotplate and tail-flick involve thermal nociception, this difference may be related to methodological differences including rat strain, body part tested, diet composition, stimulus strength (latencies are generally longer in our study), and length of dietary treatment (12 wk in Ziegler et al).

These conflicting findings are partly related to methodological differences and to participant characteristics.

This inconsistency may be related to methodological differences and especially to differences in the definition of productivity.

High prevalence variability may be related to methodological differences in the studies or differences in the work process.

While these inconsistent findings may be related to methodological differences between studies, they may also be related to caveats associated with self-report and physiological assessments.