Sentence examples for reject material from inspiring English sources

Our studies, carried out with the support of the National Science Foundation and the Defense Department, suggest that people will reject material compensation for dropping their commitment to sacred values and will defend those values regardless of the costs.

The 35 %–40 % reject material consists of two components: coarse coal processing waste (CCPW) larger than 100 mesh (150 micron) size or in some cases larger than 3 mm (1/8 inch) size, and fine coal processing waste (FCPW) or slurry generally less than 100 mesh sizes.

High-sulphate fly ash (HSFA) is a typical example of reject material, since all relevant standards (both European and ASTM) clearly define that sulphur trioxide should be kept under a certain low limit (approximately 3 5% depending on the standard) or else concrete's durability may be threatened.

The legislation states that it will reject "material support" of the measures' implementation, and goes on to claim that any person found to be exercising powers established in Sections 1021 or 1022 would risk criminal penalties.

It is worth noting that the reject materials from coal preparation of such cases may become even more enriched in the same trace elements, so that preparation may simply move the environmental impacts on the utilization plant to the waste disposal site.

Adopting the pseudonym Alexander Supertramp, rejecting material possessions and human attachments, he proclaims himself an "aesthetic voyager".

He has, for example, rejected material showing executions, and eventually decided not to run "The World's Most Embarrassing Throw-up Moments".

Mr. Gore offered some ideas, including a satire of Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday, Mr. Higgins recalled, but he rejected material that could be interpreted as disrespectful to former president Bill Clinton.

In his A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Part I (1710), he brought all objects of sense, including tangibles, within the mind; he rejected material substance, material causes, and abstract general ideas; he affirmed spiritual substance; and he answered many objections to his theory and drew the consequences, theological and epistemological.

In the first case, the author has chosen the degree to which a reader is uncertain, and has determined the wider parameters within which questions can be asked; in the latter, a different curiosity emerges, for instance with biography being crudely used to analyse the work, or rejected material being used to clarify the author's decisions.

One response would be to reject spiritual substance just as he rejected material substance.