Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The mechanical reinforcing efficiencies of two types of nanoparticles, nanotube and nanoplatelet, are compared from a micro-mechanics perspective.
Both modified GO exhibited significantly higher reinforcing efficiencies for SBR due to the combination of improved dispersion and increased surface affinity of modified GO for the rubber matrix.
Similar(58)
Surface morphology of PVA fibre played an important role in determining the reinforcement mechanisms and reinforcing efficiency.
The former showed higher reinforcing efficiency for MPC particleboards.
ZDA exhibited high reinforcing efficiency for the copolyesters.
It was reported earlier that a smaller tanδ peak depicts higher reinforcing efficiency of the fillers (Das et al. 2011).
They related the reduction of the reinforcing efficiency of clay in CPN to the imperfect exfoliation of clay.
However, poor carbon nanotube (CNT)–polymer interfacial bonding leads to the unexpected low reinforcing efficiency.
Furthermore, for unit volume of dispersed CNTs, the reinforcing efficiency decreases monotonically with increased ultrasonication.
Fornes and Paul [14] found that the intercalated layers in stacks decrease the reinforcing efficiency of clay in CPN compared to the exfoliated layers.
It was observed that organic modification improves the reinforcing efficiency of MMT in a greater extent than that of LDH [18].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com