Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(23)
Furthermore, calculations of the von Mises effective stress of the SiC and Al phases showed that the wood-derived SiC was a more effective reinforcement than either SiC particle- or whisker-reinforced composites.
There are far fewer people who need negative reinforcement than those who need the positive".
He points out that one big difference between chimpanzees and humans is that humans are far more docile, more susceptible to social reinforcement than chimpanzees are.
Fluorinated MWCNT were more efficient in reinforcement than pristine ones.
But, if Rando's rise proves anything it proves that humans communicate in more subtle ways than you might imagine, and need less social reinforcement than you might think.
Extinction occurred faster for the response paired with 50% partial reinforcement than for the response paired with continuous reinforcement.
Similar(37)
At the end of this window, in far greater need of striking reinforcements than they were last year, United have gone back to the Principality to take an even greater gamble.
Field measurements usually reveal lower tensile loads in the reinforcements than that predicted by conventional design methods.
During the FR1 and FR5 tests, sucrose-exposed rats earned less maltodextrin reinforcements than control rats (group effect: FR1, F 1, 14) = 6.2, p<0.05; F 1, F(14 14) = 5.3, p<0.05) (Figure 2B).
During the FR1 and FR5 sessions, sucrose-exposed rats earned less saccharin reinforcements than control rats (group effect: FR1, F 1, 30) = 13.7, p<0.001; F 1, F(1, 30) = 4.7, p<0.05) (Figure 1B).
Although saccharin-exposed and control rats showed similar levels of saccharin intake during the FR1 (group effect: n.s.; session effect: F(14, 196) = 16.5, p<0.0001; group x session interaction: n.s)., saccharin-exposed rats earned less saccharin reinforcements than control rats (group effect: F 1, 14) = 6.6, p<0.05; session effect: F 6, 84) = 14.2, p<0.00001; group x session interaction: n.s).s
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com