Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
Obviously, the manganese oxide nanoparticles (Fig. 4a, b) had an average size between 20 and 30 nm, and the shape of the particle was more like a regular sphere compared to the oval-shaped particles of S1 and S2 after calcination (Additional file 5: Figure S5 and Additional file 6: Figure S6).
Similar(59)
However, as shown in Fig. 3d, the flower-like architectures of SbBiS3 have a highly regular sphere-like morphology, which is obviously different from that of Sb1.6Bi0.4S3.
It is seen that all the samples present regular sphere-like particles without any adhesive behavior, and the average particle size is ~85 nm.
SEM images in Fig. 7c shows that the UHMWPE/GO-SiO2 composite granules have uniform size, good dispersion, and regular sphere-like shape.
Morphologic investigation demonstrated that the microcapsules presented regular spheres with a well-defined core shell structure.
For regular spheres, the saturation concentration corresponds theoretically to a random packing.
The resultant microcapsules showed the regular spheres with a well-defined core-shell structure and a silver outer layer.
The scanning electron microscopic investigation indicated that the resultant microcapsules presented the regular spheres with a smooth surface and a uniform size distribution, while the transmission electron microscopy showed a well-defined core shell structure for these microcapsules.
Although the Al2O3 powder has a broad size distribution covering ~0.5-1μm ~0.5-1μm3 pandicles Al2O3ot regular sparticleshis trend follows the generarebehavior expected from Mie theory; notely, that the regular spheresing coefficienthis proportrendl to scatterer concentration.
The average porosity is in agreement with the theoretical porosity for rhombohedral and cubic packing of regular-sphere grains, which is 25.96 and 47.64 %, respectively.
Finite element results well predicted deformation mechanism of structures and plastic properties of regular hollow sphere samples especially for plateau stress with less than 12% relative error.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com