Exact(20)
Then we have the following assertions: (1) (x_{0}) is a regular point of (3.1).
Then y ∈ W 0 1, p is a regular point of the Lagrangian (4.1) in the sense of Definition 4.1.
The following proposition shows that the condition (3.11) implies that (x_{0}) is regular point of (3.1).
If, then is said to be a regular point (of ) and the map is called conformal at.
It became a regular point of debate during and after the financial crisis when the legal tax affairs of wealthy residents was put under the spotlight.
Lemma 4.3 Let u ∈ A ad be a given element, and let y ∈ W 0 1, p be a regular point of the Lagrangian (4.1).
Similar(40)
The set (operatorname{reg}(A)) of regular points of A is open in (mathbb{C}).
These quantities are defined by t i = σ j i n j, q = q i n i. at regular points of the surface ∂B.
By using such a procedure, a point-wise convergence of the Fourier-Hankel series representation of the solution has been observed in the regular points of the boundaries, with Gibbs-like phenomena potentially occurring in the quasi-cusped points.
By using such a procedure, a point-wise convergence of the Fourier-like series representation of the solution has been observed in the regular points of the boundaries, with Gibbs-like phenomena potentially occurring in the quasi-cusped points.
These quantities are defined by t i = t j i n j, m i = m j i n j, λ = λ i n i, q = q i n i, at regular points of the surface ∂B.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com