Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Scan for and fix registry errors.
Since registry errors were more common for not UTD records, our study likely under-estimates the number of registry errors.
Registry errors due to children moving from another province and being considered complete by the other province's schedule (another 25% or registry errors) is a problem unique to the Canadian context, where immunization schedules can vary substantially between jurisdictions.
In the national cancer registry, errors in this item decreased from 66.5% in 1999 to 21.4% in 2008 [ 16].
Chart review indicated that 44 children were misclassified due to parent reporting and 16 due to registry errors.
Our study is the first to identify failure to transcribe varicella disease history as a considerable source of registry error (accounting for 25% of registry errors).
Similar(43)
About 103 children were excluded from analysis because their values were considered to be incorrect due to data registry error and/or incomplete anthropometric information.
In our study, no children were actually "over-immunized" due to registry error because registry information is always confirmed in the clinic chart for pre-school aged children before vaccines are administered.
The frequency of reported "missed diagnoses" depends on how the frequency of error was assessed: based on trauma registries, error rates were approximately 2%[28]], while retrospective chart review found approximately 40%[29]], and retrospective review of all admissions revealed missed or delayed diagnoses of approximately 8%-10% [28 30].
This will scan your registry for errors and compact it.
The first method followed common practice in the analysis of population-based cancer registry data: Standard errors of relative survival were obtained by dividing the standard errors of absolute survival, which were computed according to Greenwood's method (Greenwood, 1926), by the expected survival (Ederer et al, 1961).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com