Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
All authors critically reviewed the manuscript regarding its intellectual content and approved the final version submitted for publication.
Items regarding demographic information were also added to the final version of the questionnaire.
All authors held discussions regarding the content of the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.
All authors revised the draft critically with regard to important intellectual content, and approved the final version of the paper.
OM, JD, FS, HvW, PB and HvdH revised the draft critically with regard to important intellectual content, and approved the final version of the paper.
CLS, GMH and FG revised the draft critically with regard to important intelectual content, and approved the final version of the paper.
Finally, they all approved the final version.
The 30 questions of the final version focused on eliciting students' prior e-learning experience, and attitudes and perceptions regarding e-learning and face-to-face lectures.
This is the final version of the Arabic version that was used for assessing parents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antibiotic use in upper respiratory tract infections in children.
Regarding, the patient questionnaire once again all items were discussed and the experts decided which of these should be included in the final version of the questionnaire.
The final version.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com