regained in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "regained in" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the idea of recovering something within a certain context, but it lacks clarity and proper usage. Example: "After the setback, she regained in confidence and began to speak up more in meetings."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

France lost, but how much they regained in dignity and courage.

The Guardian - Sport

However, with possession often regained in advanced positions, Villa rarely had any space to break into.

The Guardian - Sport

Board gaming is "innocence regained in a world that…" He looks at me with a small smile.

The Guardian - Tech

When she trains her eye on human interaction, what's lost in nuance is regained in psychological force.

The New Yorker

Venice acquired the Peloponnese (which the Turks regained in 1715) and most of Dalmatia, including the harbour of Cattaro (Kotor).

Encyclopedia Britannica

The town Peter founded in 1708 on the site was lost to the Turks but regained in 1739.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In banking, of course, but also in religious*, media and political institutions, he claims, adding; Trust is lost in weeks and months, and regained in years and decades.

The Guardian - Business

Business investment collapsed but Americans mostly kept their jobs, and what they lost in the stockmarket, they partly regained in a property boom.

The Economist

"In the Valley of the Wolves" finds its story of kingdom lost and then regained in Big Sky country, where the cycle of life for a couple of wolf packs plays out amid the spectacular beauty of Yellowstone National Park.

The New York Times - Arts

Only the slow introduction to the finale lost momentum, but this was quickly regained in the fast and furious Allegro, where the defiant assertion of self and ethos could not fail to leave its impression.

The Guardian - Music

Called to the regular army at the beginning of World War I, he commanded a machine-gun battalion in the Middle East as acting lieutenant colonel, a rank he lost after the war but officially regained in 1938.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider replacing "regained in" with more precise alternatives like "recovered", "restored", or "reclaimed", depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Common error

Avoid using "regained in" when a more specific preposition or verb can clarify the context. For instance, instead of "trust was regained in the community", use "trust was restored within the community" or, even better, "trust was rebuilt by engaging with the community".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "regained in" functions as a prepositional phrase, often indicating the context or manner in which something was recovered or restored. However, according to Ludwig, it's considered grammatically incorrect and lacking clarity, suggesting a need for more precise wording. The examples show its use across various domains, but the phrase requires careful consideration.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

32%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "regained in" is frequently used across diverse sources, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect and often lacks clarity. This prepositional phrase aims to describe recovery or restoration within a specific context, but its imprecise nature necessitates careful consideration and potentially replacement with stronger verbs or more descriptive prepositional phrases. When writing, it's advisable to opt for alternatives such as "recovered", "restored", or "reclaimed" to maintain grammatical correctness and precision. These replacements offer clearer communication and elevate the quality of writing, especially in formal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Regained through

Emphasizes the means by which something was recovered.

Retrieved in

Refers to the act of finding and bringing something back

Recovered within

Focuses on the act of getting something back inside certain limits or scope.

Returned within

Focuses on the act of giving or bringing something back to a specific context.

Restored within

Emphasizes bringing something back to its original condition within particular circumstances.

Acquired back in

Focuses on getting something again in a certain place

Reclaimed during

Suggests getting something back, often with effort, during a specific time.

Achieved again in

Highlights the action of reaching a goal again in a situation

Recaptured within

Highlights regaining control or possession inside of something.

Reestablished during

Focuses on setting something up again during a period.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "regained in" that might offer better clarity?

Depending on the context, consider alternatives such as "recovered", "restored", or "reclaimed". For instance, use "restored in" when something is brought back to its original condition, or "reclaimed during" to highlight regaining possession during a period.

How can I improve the precision of phrases using "regained in"?

To enhance precision, replace "regained in" with a more descriptive prepositional phrase that specifies the means or context. For example, instead of "strength was regained in", try "strength was regained through rehabilitation" or "strength was regained within a month".

Is "regained in" grammatically correct, and why might Ludwig AI flag it?

According to Ludwig AI, "regained in" is not grammatically correct, this is because the phrase lacks clarity and proper usage. Better options include phrases such as "regained confidence" or "recovered in".

In what contexts is "regained in" most likely to appear, and should I avoid it in formal writing?

While "regained in" appears across various contexts like news, science, and encyclopedias, it's advisable to avoid it in formal writing due to its lack of precision and grammatical ambiguity. Opt for clearer alternatives to maintain professionalism and accuracy.