refuting evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "refuting evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evidence that contradicts or disproves a claim or argument. Example: "The researcher presented refuting evidence that challenged the validity of the initial hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

These field studies are taken as proof of safety and refuting evidence of the adverse effects observed in laboratory studies.

Environmental Sciences Europe

Perhaps the most counterintuitive notion that comes from the NOS is the well-supported view that unresolved puzzles and seemingly refuting evidence do not always result in rejection of a scientific idea (Clough, p. 76).

Evolution: Education and Outreach

So, given a specific pair of hypotheses and a proposed sequence of experiments, we don't need a general Convergence Theorem to tell us the likelihood of obtaining refuting evidence.

SEP

Students can reflect as well upon issues on the growth of science: Perhaps the most counterintuitive notion that comes from the NOS is the well-supported view that unresolved puzzles and seemingly refuting evidence do not always result in rejection of a scientific idea (Clough, p. 76).

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Let this sink in: the "journalist" who eagerly rushed to blame Muslims for the Oslo terrorist attack over the summer, before she was embarrassed by refuting evidence, thought Cain was not being fair to Muslims.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The institute concludes that the new analysis did not refute evidence that mammography is effective, and stands by its earlier recommendation: women 40 and older should have routine screening.

The New York Times

All these could represent key indications to reinforce or refute evidence of a functioning petroleum system, that is, one that generated, migrated and accumulated hydrocarbons.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

While this has not been completely refuted, evidence is limited [45, 47] and recent research has suggested that nocturnal attacks may be linked to the cycling between sleep stages, and not to a particular stage itself [10].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Fact Check Armenia's website explicitly refutes evidence that Armenians were systematically killed en masse by the Ottoman Empire, the predecessor to modern-day Turkey.

Huffington Post

A number of private 'research' entities -- including the now-infamous Tobacco Institute Research Council and The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition -- were created with the express purpose of generating biased science to refute evidence of cigarettes' health risks.

Huffington Post

Geocentrism is a bullshit pseudo-science theory based on refuted evidence but now people are using celebrities and intellectuals with perceived gravitas to dupe the world into thinking this theory has validity.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "refuting evidence", ensure the source and methodology are credible to strengthen your argument. Cite your sources clearly and explain the relevance of the evidence in disproving the initial claim.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the significance of "refuting evidence". While it may challenge a claim, it doesn't automatically nullify all related arguments. Accurately represent the scope and limitations of the evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "refuting evidence" functions as an adjective-noun combination, where 'refuting' modifies 'evidence'. This indicates evidence that contradicts or disproves a particular claim or theory. As Ludwig AI says, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "refuting evidence" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe evidence that contradicts or disproves a claim. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is valid and usable in English. While relatively rare, it appears primarily in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure your sources are credible and avoid overstating the impact of the evidence. Alternatives include "contradictory evidence" and "disproving evidence", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

contradictory evidence

Focuses on the conflicting nature of the evidence.

invalidating evidence

Emphasizes the act of making evidence void or baseless.

disproving evidence

Highlights the action of proving something to be false using evidence.

rebutting evidence

Implies countering existing evidence with new findings.

negating evidence

Highlights the evidence's ability to render something ineffective.

challenging evidence

Suggests evidence that puts existing claims into question.

overturning evidence

Indicates evidence that reverses a previous finding or conclusion.

debunking evidence

Focuses on exposing the falseness of something using evidence.

conflicting evidence

Suggests evidence that is at odds with other information.

opposing evidence

Emphasizes the contrast between the evidence and a particular stance.

FAQs

How to use "refuting evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "refuting evidence" to indicate evidence that contradicts or disproves a claim. For example: "The scientist presented "contradictory evidence", effectively refuting the previous theory."

What are some alternatives to "refuting evidence"?

Alternatives to "refuting evidence" include "contradictory evidence", "invalidating evidence", or "disproving evidence". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

What is the difference between "refuting evidence" and "supporting evidence"?

"Refuting evidence" challenges a claim by providing information that disproves it, whereas "supporting evidence" strengthens a claim by providing information that confirms it. They serve opposite purposes in an argument.

Can "refuting evidence" completely invalidate a theory?

While "refuting evidence" can significantly weaken a theory, whether it completely invalidates it depends on the strength and quantity of the evidence, as well as the availability of alternative explanations or "supporting evidence" for the original theory.