reffered to

USAGE SUMMARY

"referred to" is correct and usable in written English.
Generally, you can use it when speaking about something that was already mentioned or indicated earlier in the text (either explicitly or implicitly). For example: The study's results, as referred to earlier, provide evidence that the new intervention is effective.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Another referred to Aristotle.

The New York Times

"They're referred to constantly.

The New York Times

Mr. Osterweis referred to "unprints".

The New York Times

Shadowy international connections are referred to.

The New York Times

This is often referred to as "mirroring".

The New York Times - Health

The case has been referred to prosecutors.

The New York Times

They referred to each other as Rambo.

The New Yorker

That process is referred to as consolidation.

The New Yorker

Arabs referred to it as Serendib.

Encyclopedia Britannica

(Chris referred to Jack as his "uncle").

The New Yorker

They only referred to five people.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always double-check your spelling. "Reffered to" is a common misspelling; ensure you use the correct spelling, "referred to".

Common error

The most common mistake is misspelling "referred" as "reffered". Proofread carefully to avoid this error, which can detract from your writing's credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reffered to" is a misspelling and therefore has no grammatical function. The correct spelling, "referred to", functions as a passive verb phrase. Ludwig confirms that "referred to" is correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The query "reffered to" is a misspelling of "referred to". As Ludwig AI confirms, the correct phrase is "referred to". This phrase is used to indicate that something has been previously mentioned or that someone is directing attention to a specific topic. Always double-check your spelling to avoid using the incorrect form. Since there are no examples of the misspelled phrase, it is important to use the correct spelling to maintain credibility in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mentioned

This alternative is a direct and simple way of saying something was spoken or written about.

spoken of

This alternative emphasizes the act of speaking about something.

made reference to

This alternative is a more formal way of saying something was mentioned.

alluded to

This alternative focuses on indirect references rather than direct mentions.

touched upon

This alternative suggests briefly mentioning something.

brought up

This alternative implies introducing a topic into a conversation.

cited

This alternative indicates referencing a specific source.

identified as

This alternative means to name or recognize something specifically.

drawn attention to

This alternative means to highlight or emphasize something.

designated as

This alternative implies assigning a specific title or role.

FAQs

What is the correct spelling, "reffered to" or "referred to"?

The correct spelling is "referred to". "Reffered to" is a misspelling and should be avoided.

How do I use "referred to" in a sentence?

You can use "referred to" to indicate that something has been mentioned previously. For example, "The study's results, as "referred to" earlier, show a significant improvement."

What can I say instead of "referred to"?

You can use alternatives such as "mentioned", "alluded to", or "spoken of depending" on the context.

What's the difference between "referred to" and "alluded to"?

"Referred to" typically implies a direct mention, while "alluded to" suggests an indirect or implied reference.