Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
There is a significant difference, however, between the non-referred and the urgent referred groups.
The CTQ was validated with data from over 2,000 respondents, including both clinical and non referred groups [ 33].
Principal component analysis (PCA) was also applied to the analysed groups to verify the distribution of the variables for the referred groups.
Results showed a difference between the size of the exophoric deviation between the two groups with subjects in the referred groups tending to have a larger deviation (one way ANOVA p < 0.005 Cohen's d = 0.15).
To assess/rate the ICCs or Kappa we used the following scoring system: >0.9 excellent >0.8 good >0.7 acceptable >0.6 questionable >0.5 poor <0.5 unacceptable [ 16, 17] We analyzed all of the questions (items) in referred groups separately and one by one, but due to the large number of questions we reported the results based on their pertinent domain.
Although some groups have reusable resultants, those are actually never reused (if groups that are lower in the table use as sources resultants from higher groups, the sources of all referred groups would be previously consumed in groups that occupy even higher positions in the table).
Similar(54)
There is no significant difference between the non-urgent referred group versus the two other groups (non-referred group or the urgent referred group) for the 3 days period.
Perinatal mortality was 45.6 per 1000 in the non-referred group and 109 per 1000 in the referred group (RR 2.4).
Productivity costs accounted for 81% of the costs in the non-referred group and 72% of the costs in the referred group.
Curelator Headache identified MO in 29% of individuals in a predominantly physician referred group (US) and in 19% in a predominantly population recruited group (UK).
The clinical records of 50 culture-positive cases each of in-house (group A) and referred (group B) post cataract surgery endophthalmitis were analyzed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com