Sentence examples for references compared with from inspiring English sources

It is, though, frankly bizarre that his partner of many years is never introduced as such and receives just four passing references compared with five for his dog, Bobby.

what is the research level (RL) distribution of these cited references compared with that of cancer research papers?

There were > 4.5 times more references in advisories to adverse health effects (419 references) compared with beneficial health effects (92 references) associated with fish consumption.

For the years 1999 2001, there were over 100 000 such papers, and their characteristics were used to see how the cited references compared with them, with due account being taken of the differences expected in mean RLs (the cited references being more clinical than oncology papers overall).

how do countries' relative presences among the cited references compare with their presences in cancer research?

The objective was to answer several policy-related questions: how do countries' relative presences among the cited references compare with their presences in cancer research?

We observed a large increase in the imputation quality of rare variants when using GoNL as the reference compared with 1000G.

However, a similar global hypomethylation of gene-poor regions was seen on the X chromosome in the female reference compared with all XY cultures, irrespective of sample type.

There was a non-linear relationship with the number of past-year quit attempts, which was transformed into a categorical variable with 0 as the reference compared with one attempt, or ≥2 attempts.

Adjusted HRs for CHD were also estimated using patients with all lipid measures in the highest tertile, tertile 3, as the reference, compared with tertile 1 or decile 1 of each lipid measure (Table 3).

The availability of policies and/or protocols that require consumer involvement was reported by 43% (n = 51) of research organisations, who commonly reported Ethics Committee Terms of Reference, compared with 29% (n = 17) of research funders.