Sentence examples for reference to subject from inspiring English sources
Reference to subject: 66%% (233 tokens).
Pronoun reference to subject of preceding sentence: 79.89 % (699 tokens).
Experiment 1: results of agreed codings Pronoun reference to subject of preceding sentence: 79.89 % (699 tokens) Pronoun reference to non-subject of preceding sentence: 20.11 % (176 tokens).
Pronoun reference in imperfective aspect and future-marked sentence pairs (total 355 tokens) Reference to subject: 91 % (323 tokens) Reference to post-verbal Goal: 9 % (32 tokens).
Pronoun reference in perfective aspect sentence pairs (total 353 tokens) Reference to subject: 66%% (233 tokens) Reference to post-verbal Goal: 34%% (120 tokens).
(15) Pronoun reference in perfective aspect sentence pairs (total 353 tokens) Reference to subject: 66%% (233 tokens) Reference to post-verbal Goal: 34%% (120 tokens) Pronoun reference in imperfective aspect and future-marked sentence pairs (total 355 tokens) Reference to subject: 91 % (323 tokens) Reference to post-verbal Goal: 9 % (32 tokens) .
In the second approach, confounding is modeled without reference to subject-type in the spirit of the Roy model.
Pronoun reference to subjects and non-subjects in non-TOP sentences (660 tokens) Reference to subjects: 83.48 % (551 tokens) Reference to non-subjects: 16.52 % (109 tokens).
(9) Pronoun reference to subjects and non-subjects in non-TOP sentences (660 tokens) Reference to subjects: 83.48 % (551 tokens) Reference to non-subjects: 16.52 % (109 tokens) Pronoun reference to subjects and non-subjects in TOP sentences (215 tokens) Reference to subjects: 68.83 % (148 tokens) Reference to non-subjects: 31.16 % (67 tokens) .
The actual feature that is the foundation of the disposition to generate value experiences in the subject is determined purely objectively, that is, without any reference to subjects.
For analysis of the pyrosequencing data, the relative amounts of the different phyla were first determined in the control group and these amounts were used as a baseline for reference to subjects in the treated group.
