In order to identify more precisely which DMUs are most important as benchmarks, the output-specific reference shares ρ were calculated (see Table 4).
Given its population reference, SHARE-FI would not be appropriate for the screening of frailty in non-community settings (e.g. hospitals or geriatric residential settings), as not only SHARE did not target this population, but the average level of frailty in those settings could make some of the items inapplicable and/or inappropriate.
A further challenge is how the scientific community should best describe and/or reference shared data that is used in secondary analyses.
To identify the goal of the other one's gaze in the frame of reference of the observer or, alternatively, in a world-centered frame of reference shared by both agents, the spatial relationship of the two agents and the relationship of potential goal objects relative to the two agents needs to be taken into account also.
From the above it can be concluded that all, or at least most, paradoxes of self-reference share a common underlying structure — independent on whether they are semantic, set-theoretic or epistemic.
Senbanjo cites his Nigerian roots as a major source of his visual inspiration, though formally, his visual references share affinities with Jean-Michel Basquiat and Keith Haring.
It is based on calculation of the reference-share which takes into account not only a number of times when efficient DMU is a benchmark but also the values of λ (see Appendix for explanation).
For each efficient DMU j which acts as a referent for inefficient DMU i, the fraction of the total aggregated potentials for increase in output r is defined as the reference-share ρ: {rho}_j^r=frac{{displaystyle {sum}_{iepsilon N}}{lambda}_{ij}left {y}_{ri}^p - {y}_{ri}right)}{y_r^P - {y}_r}, (4 where.
It ebbs and flows, jumps around in time and tense, references shared experience or knowledge to exchange new experiences and knowledge.
