Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
The acoustic emission sensor iMPact XS with accuracy is ±5% with a reference sensitivity of >1200 pC/N was fixed on the DCB-specimens with a two-sided adhesive tape with thickness of 0,5 mm.
P b {A} is the probability of event A, P S is the received power of the wanted DVB-T signal, PS,min is the DVB-T receivers (noise limited) reference sensitivity level, P U k is the received power of the k th unwanted DVB-T signal, and r U k is the DVB-T-to-DVB-T protection ratio for the k th DVB-T interferer [15].
As a reference, sensitivity and specificity of the presence of anti-CCP2 antibodies were 54 % and 96%%, respectively, and of IgM-RF 59%and91%91 %.
Taken tumor assessment performed by the radiologists as the standard of reference, sensitivity and specificity of detecting progressive disease by the assistant were analyzed.
In 319 patients evaluated with follow-up as the standard of reference, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 76.6 % and 100%%, and the negative and positive predictive values were 91.4 % and 100%%, respectively [ 14].
Using the results of conventional cultures as reference, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) values for detecting MRSA (at the patient level) were 100%95%5% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 1), 94.3% (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97), 35.7% (95% CI 0.14 to 0.64) and 100%95%5% CI 0.97 to 1) for both screening tests together.
Similar(54)
When using venom skin testing as a diagnostic reference, sensitivities and specificities of DELFIA were equivalent to Phadia CAP for JJAV sIgE.
This corresponds to a baseline MNRU sensitivity of dB and a baseline T-Reference sensitivity of 10 units.
WGA: Whole genome amplification; NRS: Non-reference sensitivity.
The non-reference sensitivity and non-reference discrepancy rates were 97.1%and7.0%0%, respectively.
Non-reference sensitivity is the fraction of sites called variants (A/B or B/B) in comparison to those that are also called variants in evaluation data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com