Similar(60)
We refer the reader to Appendix B and [18] for more detail.
n We refer the reader to Appendix C for proof of convergence of the proposed iterative estimator.
Due to the similarity, we again refer the reader to Appendix 3 for a detailed mathematical derivation of the time-domain method.
We highlight the main results of the simulation study here, but refer the reader to Appendix S2, Table S1, and Figure S1 for a more detailed summary, including performance statistics for all six age-at-harvest model estimators and three Downing reconstruction estimators applied to each simulation scenario.
We summarize the concept of the method and refer the reader to Appendix D for details.
We refer the reader to appendix 2 on bmj.com for detailed results for our secondary outcomes.
For brevity we omit details and refer the reader to Appendix C. A final ranking J that incorporates all 3 n y previously calculated rankings is obtained as follows.
For the details, we refer the reader to the Appendix A. With this technical approximation in place, all eigenvalues λ i (i = 1,..., N) are real, and the largest eigenvalue of W is exactly one (λ1 = 1), with corresponding eigenvector v 1 = ( 1 / N ) [ 1, 1, …, 1 ] T = ( 1 / N ) 1 N as shown in Figure 6.
We refer the reader to the Appendix for an essential lexicon on graphical models.
Please refer to the Appendix.
Please refer to the "Appendix 1" section.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com