Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
redundancy in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "redundancy in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing unnecessary repetition or superfluous elements in a particular context, such as writing, speech, or systems. Example: "The redundancy in the report made it difficult to understand the main points clearly."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
It's also a redundancy in certain sports.
News & Media
Her health has deteriorated significantly since redundancy in 2010.
News & Media
Is the redundancy in the title self-mocking or just bluntly declarative?
News & Media
Hendy said the problems proved there was enough "redundancy" in the system to cope.
News & Media
The Air Force is increasingly a redundancy in structure and spending.
News & Media
Redundancy in your early 30s can be a dark, lonely place.
News & Media
Redundancy, in its various senses, is a recurrent theme of the book.
News & Media
Salinger's use of reiteration and redundancy in Holden's self-communion conveys this.
News & Media
Our concept of what an acceptable backup site is and how far away it ought to be and the redundancy in communication lines is just as important as redundancy in the computers.
News & Media
Both Alana and Mark, the parents of two small children, have lost good jobs through redundancy in the past year.
News & Media
He worked hard to eliminate redundancy in the controls and to make the engineering intuitive and ergonomic.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When revising your writing, actively seek out instances of "redundancy in" your phrasing. Eliminating unnecessary repetition strengthens your message and improves clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "redundancy in" excessively, especially in technical documentation. Overusing the phrase can make your writing sound repetitive and convoluted. Instead, directly point out the redundant elements and explain how to streamline them.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "redundancy in" primarily functions as a noun phrase acting as a subject or object within a sentence. It typically identifies the presence of unnecessary repetition or duplication within a specific context, as seen in Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
32%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
2%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "redundancy in" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote unnecessary repetition or duplication. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's applicable across a range of contexts, from scientific research to news reporting. While "redundancy in" itself is valid, avoid overuse and be specific about what is being repeated. Opt for alternatives like "repetition in" or "duplication in" when more precise language is required. By being mindful of usage, you can effectively leverage "redundancy in" to enhance clarity and precision in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
repetition in
Focuses specifically on the act of repeating something, whether it's a word, phrase, or action.
duplication in
Emphasizes the presence of identical copies or instances, often implying an unnecessary or inefficient replication.
overlap in
Highlights the shared characteristics or functions between two or more things, suggesting potential superfluity.
excess in
Indicates a surplus or overabundance of something, suggesting that it is more than what is needed or desired.
superfluity in
Draws attention to the presence of something that is unnecessary or excessive, often implying a negative impact on efficiency or clarity.
reiteration in
Highlights the act of saying or doing something again, potentially to the point of being repetitive or tedious.
tautology in
Refers to a statement that is true by definition, but provides no new information or insight.
pleonasm in
Emphasizes the use of more words than are necessary to express an idea, often for rhetorical effect.
verbosity in
Focuses on the use of an excessive number of words, often making communication unclear or confusing.
surplus in
Indicates an amount of something that is more than what is needed or used.
FAQs
How can I identify "redundancy in" my writing?
Look for phrases or information that are repeated unnecessarily, or that convey the same meaning using different words. Cutting these out can make your writing more concise and impactful.
What are some alternatives to the phrase "redundancy in"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "repetition in", "duplication in", or "overlap in".
Is it always bad to have "redundancy in" a system or text?
Not always. In some contexts, like engineering or data storage, redundancy can be beneficial as it provides backup and fault tolerance. However, in writing or communication, it usually detracts from clarity.
How does "redundancy in" code affect software performance?
"Redundancy in" code can lead to larger file sizes, increased execution time, and potential inefficiencies. Optimizing code to remove unnecessary or duplicated sections can improve overall performance.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested