Sentence examples for reductionist stance from inspiring English sources

If he is usually unrepentant about his reductionist stance, it is because this analytical procedure is the only systematic procedure he knows, and it is one that has yielded virtually the whole harvest of scientific inquiry.

Taking a reductionist stance, which he believes is necessary to avoid an "untenable dualism" in biology between physicalism and antireductionism, he argues that the principle of natural selection (PNS) should be properly viewed as a basic law of physical science (specifically chemistry), which can operate at the level of atoms and molecules (2006, p. 189 191).

More typical is Richard Owen's discussion of matter and its properties within living organisms, where he exhibits a clear anti-reductionist stance and postulates something akin to emergent properties.[4] This perspective was shared by many comparative anatomists who used an "analysis:synthesis" style of reasoning and worked on marine invertebrates with complex life histories (Elwick 2007).

However, since different notions and models of reduction have been put forward, whether one takes a reductionist or anti-reductionist stance about a particular biological subdiscipline (e.g., classical genetics) actually depends on the notion of "reduction" being utilized (Wimsatt 1976b, Hull 1979).

Additionally, the rise of sociobiology and gene-centered evolutionary explanations provoked anti-reductionist stances among biologists on the basis of social and political commitments (e.g., Levins and Lewontin 1985).

The approach to this complexity reflects the tension between a reductionist, reverse-engineering stance, and more abstract, systemic ones.

Rather, it is a specific reductionist as well as a naturalist stance that accompany these identity-claims that make them proper "type-identity" claims.

"It was promoting Minimal art in overwhelming doses, and it had forced reductionist art modes on everybody with its aggressive ideological stance.

Despite Berger's sympathy in dealing with religious phenomena, the methodological stance adopted in this book seems to imply a reductionist position namely, one in which religious beliefs are explained by reference to basically nonreligious sentiments, sociopsychological circumstances, and other factors.

They're hugely reductionist.

Jung considered Freud too reductionist.