reduction with time

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reduction with time" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a decrease or diminishment that occurs as time progresses. Example: "The study showed a significant reduction with time in the levels of pollutants in the water."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

In addition, the observed postseismic signal reveals a strong reduction with time.

Earth, Planets and Space

However, the permeability of the elements in failure area shows a slight reduction with time.

International Journal of Coal Science & Technology

4D ERT inversion provided estimates of the regions of the source zone experiencing mass reduction with time.

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

The ipsilateral AUC demonstrated a reduction with time during the four measurement points in the overall analysis (F 2.0,162.4 = 15.6, P < 0.001).

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Regardless of the w/c ratio, the tensile stresses of RC specimens showed about 10%% reduction with time compared to those of NC specimens.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

A reduction with time is attributed to the depletion of these compounds and to the increase in pH, thus reducing their solubility in leachate, and enhancing precipitation.

Applied Water Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

A long-term analysis should be conducted to determine if this surface reduction will decrease with time.

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Democrats warned that Republicans were proposing unacceptable reductions with time running short before a March 4 deadline when the stopgap measure now financing the federal government runs out.

The New York Times

Boron III) is reduced in a single step; the rate of reduction decreases with time.

Electrochimica Acta

Therefore, SAX will be fit to use for noise reduction purpose with time series such as in the case of our data which is collected from sensors in a noisy environment, i.e., while driving on different road surfaces.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

These results suggest that AACTP is effective in producing short-term reductions in MWD, but that the reductions attenuate with time.

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing trends in scientific data, use "reduction with time" to clearly indicate a decreasing value or quantity as the time variable increases. For clarity, specify the units of measurement and the time scale involved.

Common error

Avoid implying a causal relationship solely based on observed reduction over time. While time can be a factor, ensure you have sufficient evidence to support a direct cause-and-effect relationship rather than a mere correlation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduction with time" functions primarily as a noun phrase indicating a decrease or decline that occurs as time progresses. Examples in Ludwig illustrate its use in describing changes in scientific data and experimental results. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

95%

News & Media

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reduction with time" accurately describes a decreasing trend over a period, as confirmed by Ludwig. While grammatically sound, it's crucial to use it accurately and avoid implying causation without sufficient evidence. More common alternatives like "decrease over time" might be preferred for broader audiences, but "reduction with time" maintains its value, especially in scientific and technical contexts. The phrase is frequently found in scientific publications and research, indicating its suitability for formal and objective writing. Always ensure your context supports the claim of reduction and avoid using time as the sole indicator of causation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

decrease over time

This alternative is a more common and straightforward way to express the same concept using simpler vocabulary.

decline over time

This alternative emphasizes a gradual deterioration or weakening as time passes.

diminishment over time

This alternative suggests a gradual lessening or reduction in size, importance, or intensity.

gradual decrease

This alternative highlights the step-by-step quality of the reduction.

progressive reduction

This alternative specifies that the reduction happens in stages or increments.

temporal decrease

This alternative utilizes a more formal tone, explicitly referencing the temporal aspect.

attenuation over time

This alternative implies a weakening or tapering off of something over a period.

lessening with time

This alternative substitutes a synonym for reduction, maintaining the original structure.

erosion over time

This alternative implies a wearing away or gradual destruction as time elapses.

weakening over time

This alternative suggests the lessening of strength or intensity as time goes on.

FAQs

How can I use "reduction with time" in a sentence?

You can use "reduction with time" to describe a decrease or diminishment that occurs as time progresses. For example: "The experiment showed a significant reduction with time in the concentration of the substance."

What are some alternatives to "reduction with time"?

Alternatives include "decrease over time", "decline over time", or "diminishment over time", which convey similar meanings depending on the specific context.

Is it more appropriate to say "decrease over time" or "reduction with time"?

"Decrease over time" is generally more common and widely understood. "Reduction with time" is acceptable, particularly in scientific contexts, but might sound slightly more formal or technical.

Can "reduction with time" imply causation?

No, "reduction with time" describes a correlation, not necessarily a causation. To imply causation, you need to provide evidence that time is directly causing the reduction, rather than just observing that they occur together.