reduction with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reduction with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing a process or method that involves reducing something in conjunction with another element or factor. Example: "The study focused on the reduction with the use of advanced filtration techniques to improve water quality."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There will be no reduction with the new service provided.

The Guardian

Meador, K. J. Seizure Reduction with Fluoxetine in Dravet Syndrome.

Stanford University

Energy consumption and pollution are ripe for reduction with responsive technology.

The Guardian

The food industry, too, has taken up sodium reduction with new energy.

The New York Times - Food

Try "Miracl" (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), another Lipitor study.

The New York Times

In this process, the metal is obtained from uranium tetrafluoride by thermal reduction with magnesium.

Britannica

"They" play politics with deficit reduction, with government shutdowns, with health care.

The Washington Post

On a small scale, silicon can be obtained from the oxide by reduction with aluminum.

Britannica

LDL cholesterol reduction with drugs such as statins has been demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Harvard University

This allows future data reduction, with different models, for example, to be completely automated.

Cornell University

Substantial and sustained seizure reduction with ketogenic diet in a patient with Ohtahara syndrome.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reduction with", ensure the sentence clearly indicates what is being reduced and what factor it is being reduced in conjunction with. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid implying a direct causal link between the reduction and the accompanying factor if one doesn't exist. Use "reduction associated with" if the relationship is correlational rather than causal.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduction with" primarily functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, indicating a decrease or lessening in conjunction with another factor. Ludwig AI provides examples where it describes a decline or mitigation occurring alongside a specific element or process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

28%

Academia

21%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reduction with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that describes a decrease or lessening happening in conjunction with another element. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms its validity, highlighting its presence across diverse fields, including science, news, and academia. While generally neutral, its usage requires careful attention to ensure clear indication of what is being reduced and the factors involved. When considering alternative phrasing, options like "decrease with" or "diminution with" can be used depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase "reduction with" is applicable in multiple contexts and its meaning remains consistent across diverse domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

decrease with

Direct synonym, focusing on the act of diminishing alongside something else.

diminution with

More formal synonym emphasizing the process of becoming smaller, less important, or less in amount in connection to something else.

lessening with

Focuses on making something less severe or serious in conjunction with another aspect.

decline with

Implies a gradual deterioration or decrease alongside something else.

alleviation with

Suggests making suffering, deficiency, or a problem less severe when paired with another element.

mitigation with

Emphasizes reducing the severity, seriousness, or painfulness of something in combination with another thing.

curtailment with

Focuses on restricting or reducing something in connection to something else.

abatement with

More formal, implying the ending, reduction, or suppression of something alongside another factor.

shrinking with

Suggests a physical reduction in size or extent together with something else.

cutback with

Informal term for reducing or limiting something in combination with another factor.

FAQs

How can I use "reduction with" in a sentence?

Use "reduction with" to describe a decrease or lessening that occurs alongside another element. For example, "The study observed a significant "seizure reduction with" the new medication".

What are some alternatives to "reduction with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "decrease with", "diminution with", or "lessening with".

Is it correct to say "reduction with"?

Yes, "reduction with" is a grammatically correct phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples of its use in reputable sources.

What's the difference between "reduction with" and "reduction of"?

"Reduction with" indicates that a reduction is happening in conjunction or along with something else, while "reduction of" simply refers to the act of decreasing something. For instance, "CO2 reduction with immediate benefit" versus "reduction of emissions".