Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(56)
This will cost $2.55bn to establish the emissions reduction fund.
Hell, why not include all of the $2.55bn in the emissions reduction fund too?
The report notes that Australia's Coalition government has "replaced carbon-pricing mechanism with Emissions Reduction Fund.
Changes in agriculture or mining, for instance, would swamp anything the emissions reduction fund does".
Butler said the rebadged emissions reduction fund would not counter the trend of rising emissions.
"After five years and $2.25bn spent, Tony Abbott's ineffective emissions reduction fund only saw pollution rise".
Alternatively he could put a lot more money into his $2.55bn emissions reduction fund – most of which is already allocated.
The Ai Group said achieving the new target using only the emissions reduction fund would cost between $100bn and $250bn.
Similar(3)
"So we can take into account what is being achieved under the Emissions Reduction Fund".
He said the government was paying polluters to pollute less under the Emissions Reduction Fund.
Coalition wants to boost emissions reduction fund – but what did voters get for $2.3bn?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com