Sentence examples for reducing the cost effectiveness from inspiring English sources

However, lithography-based nanopatterning method is not suitable for mass production because it is a time-consuming process requiring delicate and expensive equipment, reducing the cost effectiveness.

However, the instruments, if used as screening tools, would include a large number of children who do not have psychosocial disability, thus reducing the cost effectiveness of a resource-intensive intervention.

In each of these cases, changes that lessen the morbidity or mortality of disease reduce the cost effectiveness of vaccination (resulting in higher incremental cost effectiveness ratios).

Increasing the discount rate reduced the cost effectiveness of both annual and biannual CDTI, with this reduction being more pronounced the lower the precontrol endemicity level.

The survival of patients on methadone treatment programs for opiate dependence is reduced, 68 and this will reduce the cost effectiveness of anti-HCV treatment in this patient group, as it will reduce their post cure survival.

Germany's generous solar subsidies covered the roofs of one of the world's most sunless countries with solar cells, thus pushing up the price of silicon and reducing the cost-effectiveness of solar power in countries where it actually makes sense.

Batteries require more frequent maintenance, which would reduce the cost-effectiveness of a stand-alone messaging system.

Besides, the necessity of additional SiO2 etch masks in the method using dewetted Ni etch masks increases the number of fabrication steps, and therefore, reduces the cost-effectiveness.

In the SPG stimulation cohort, higher SPG therapy effectiveness leads to overall cost savings at follow-up longer than 5 years, while lower therapy effectiveness reduces the cost-effectiveness, as evidenced by an increased ICER.

A reduction in the burden of severe febrile illness due to improved availability of other treatments (for example, as a result of the ACT subsidy scheme, or vaccine development) would reduce the cost-effectiveness of rectal treatments, unless delivery costs were substantially lowered (for example, through improved targeting of interventions).

Reducing the number of screening rounds seems to slightly reduce the cost-effectiveness of screening.