In 1905 for example, a collection attorney successfully sued J. Grossman's Sons to recover legal fees for reducing to judgment a debt of $875 owed to J. Grossman's Sons.
Nor can the judgment of the impartial spectator be reduced to the judgment of society, even where those two judgments coincide.
Though the remuneration was reduced to $3 billion, the judgment eventually forced Texaco to file for bankruptcy.
For all those who have given up living here and now, because the meaning of their entire lives has been reduced to preparing for judgment day and avoiding hell at all cost, will it improve their human plight?
The investor Carl C. Icahn made $700 million on a 12percentt stake he took in the company, after Texaco succeeded in having the judgment reduced to $3 billion.
But they overshot the mark: The woman was a slender thing, not a Percheron, and she passed out, and her judgment was reduced to where her affection for them didn't mean much.
Furthermore, moral judgments are reduced to statements of a psychological state, so much so that ethics becomes a branch of empirical psychology.
Meanwhile, logical empiricists (or logical positivists) were interested only in the analysis of expressions of moral judgment, which they reduced to imperative statements that are emotive and aimed at winning adherents.
You know, the verdict the conservative "activist judges" on the Supreme Court set precedent and forever capped negligent corporation's punitive damages?! WHAT?! Their initial $5 billion dollar judgment had been reduced to $500 million.
He was sentenced to death, a judgment that was later reduced to life imprisonment.
