reduced than for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reduced than for" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an attempt to compare reductions in some context, but the structure is flawed. Example: "The costs are reduced than for last year’s budget." (This is incorrect.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Those effects appeared more pronounced for the reduced than for the normal bone stock model.

Journal of Biomechanics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Though 4 should still be considered a relatively strong donor, these potentials are less reducing than for Bb (E1/2=−1.36 V, E1/2=−1.23 V vs. SCE), 23 showing that the bispyridinylidene framework is less sensitive to substitution at the 2-, rathan then the 4-position, of the pyridyl ring.

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Similar to CV1, CV2 prediction accuracies were higher within the same environment (S1) than when predicting between environments (S1 → S2), where prediction accuracies for growth traits were more reduced than those for wood traits (Table  5).

BMC Genomics

Does the higher affinity of Δgpαf for reduced PDI than for oxidized PDI affect the rate of retrotranslocation?

Cell

The CN− broadening was still observed with the K563L mutant, although the level of broadening is reduced more than for the Ni-deficient enzyme, perhaps due to an electrostatic effect of the amino group of Lys-563 on CN− binding.

Biochemistry

Copulation did occur between males of B. plicatilis s.s. and Clade B females, but at a significantly reduced rate than for self-crosses, and males of Clade A B. manjavacas did not copulate with Clade B females.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

More people perceived e-cigarettes as being useful for reducing smoking than for quitting (50.6% vs 29.9%, p<0.001), as well as for reducing smoking than as being harmful to users (50.6% vs 40.1%, p=0.044).

BMJ Open

Fourth, within-population CVs for human height might be low due to reduced VE rather than reduced VA, for instance due to niche construction leading to reduced environmental variance [38].

Plosone

Lactic acid bacteria counts were on average one log higher for reduced fat cheeses than for full fat control cheese and counts decreasing with aging.

Journal of Dairy Science

Typically, the dynamic absorption needs to be an order of magnitude lower than reduced scattering for the model to be absolutely valid.

Biomedical Optics Express

For selection coefficients greater than 0.3, Ne values are significantly reduced to lower than 24 for TSA and 27 for ACU, considering the highest rates of mutation for the range used.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing reductions, use clearer comparative structures like "reduced compared to" or "lower than". This avoids grammatical ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "reduced than for" as it is grammatically incorrect. Instead, opt for "reduced compared to" or another similar alternative to ensure clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduced than for" attempts to function as a comparative, indicating a lesser degree or amount. However, it does not conform to standard English grammar. As Ludwig AI indicates, the structure is flawed.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reduced than for" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, noting the flawed structure. While it appears in some sources, clearer alternatives like "reduced compared to", "lower than", or "less than" are preferred for accurate and professional communication. The phrase attempts to function as a comparative, indicating a lessened degree, but its non-standard structure undermines its effectiveness. Always opt for grammatically correct alternatives to ensure clarity in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced compared to

Similar to the original but replaces "than for" with "compared to", improving clarity.

lower than for

Uses a more standard comparative adjective, "lower", instead of "reduced".

less than for

Employs "less" to indicate a smaller quantity or degree, maintaining a comparative structure.

smaller than for

Replaces "reduced" with "smaller" for comparisons involving size or amount.

decreased compared to

Uses "decreased" to indicate a reduction, coupled with "compared to" for a clearer comparison.

lessened compared to

Employs "lessened" to indicate a decrease, using "compared to" for better grammatical structure.

diminished compared to

Substitutes "reduced" with "diminished", offering a more formal alternative.

weaker than for

Uses "weaker" to describe a reduction in strength or intensity.

not as much as for

Emphasizes the comparative difference using a more descriptive phrase.

to a lesser extent than for

Indicates a smaller degree or scope of reduction.

FAQs

What's a grammatically correct alternative to "reduced than for"?

Use phrases like "reduced compared to", "lower than for", or "less than for" for clarity.

How can I use "reduced compared to" in a sentence?

Example: "The machining force was reduced by 50% compared to milling at the same material removal rate."

Is "reduced than for" considered standard English?

No, "reduced than for" is not considered standard English and should be avoided in formal writing. It is grammatically incorrect.

What’s the difference between "reduced than for" and "reduced compared to"?

"Reduced than for" is grammatically incorrect. "Reduced compared to" is the corrected form for making comparisons.