Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

reduced of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reduced of" is not correct in written English.
The correct expression would typically be "reduced by" or "reduced from." Example: "The price was reduced by 20% during the sale."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Such taxes were reduced, of course, during the presidency of George W. Bush.

News & Media

The New York Times

The elegant Provençal city will have its train travel times from Paris the most sharply reduced of any destination on the way south.

This is consistent to the reduced of R rec.

Recent results show that SI can be reduced of around 100 dB [6, 8].

On the contrary, the drop is reduced of 0.4 °C for VT.

The intake of symptomatic medications was reduced of about 12%, but the difference was not statistically significant.

In this paper it will be shown how the ceramic yield was improved and the shrinkage reduced of poly(carbosilane).

In addition, the thermal diffusivity has been reduced of about 35.47% with respect to the basic composition.

Then, employing Galerkin method, those equations have been reduced of time dependent differential equation with variable coefficients.

In particular, this antinutrient compound was significantly reduced of about 50% in both C1 and C2, likely through the activation of microbial and endogenous phytases.

The membrane selectivity was reduced of ca. 25 and 50% in presence of 50 and 100%% of relative humidity in the feed stream, respectively.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a reduction, always use "by" or "from" instead of "of". For example, say "reduced by 20%" or "reduced from the original value".

Common error

Avoid using "of" to indicate the amount of reduction. "Of" typically denotes possession or association, not a quantitative change. Using the correct preposition ensures clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduced of" functions as a prepositional phrase, attempting to modify a noun or verb by indicating a decrease or lessening. However, as pointed out by Ludwig AI, this construction is grammatically incorrect in standard English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "reduced of" appears frequently across various sources, particularly in scientific and news media, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI underscores the correct usage involves using "reduced by" or "reduced from" to accurately convey a reduction. To avoid errors, remember to use the proper preposition to specify the amount or origin of the reduction. Although common, the incorrect usage of "reduced of" diminishes the clarity and professionalism of your writing. Remember to rely on accurate prepositions to ensure you are expressing your idea properly.

FAQs

How do I properly use "reduced" in a sentence?

Use "reduced by" or "reduced from" to indicate the extent of the reduction. For example, "The price was "reduced by" 10%" or "The number of errors was "reduced from" five to two".

What's the correct preposition to use after "reduced"?

The correct prepositions are "by" and "from". "By" is used to specify the amount of reduction (e.g., ""reduced by" half"), while "from" indicates the original value (e.g., ""reduced from" its peak").

Is "reduced of" ever correct?

No, "reduced of" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The proper phrasing involves using "by" or "from" to accurately convey the reduction.

What are some alternatives to the phrase "reduced of"?

Instead of "reduced of", you can use phrases like "decreased by", "lessened by", or "diminished by" to correctly express the concept of reduction.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: