reduced benefit for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reduced benefit for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a decrease in advantages or positive outcomes associated with a particular situation or action. Example: "The new policy resulted in a reduced benefit for employees, leading to dissatisfaction among the staff."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

For example, a retrospective analysis of the HERA trial dataset (Dowsett et al, 2009) investigated whether IHC status (2+ vs 3+), the degree of FISH amplification or polysomy of chromosome 17 affected clinical outcome and the conclusion was that there was no evidence for reduced benefit for adjuvant trastuzumab in IHC2+FISH+ cases.

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Last Sunday on "Face the Nation," for example, Nancy Pelosi said, "I could never support any arrangement that reduced benefits for Medicare".

The New York Times

Doing nothing is no longer an option, for it leads to three bitter choices in the near future: crippling levels of payroll taxation, significantly reduced benefits for Social Security recipients, or a crushing burden of public debt for generations to come.

The New York Times

In our report, we make a number of proposals, some of which entail reduced benefits for better-off pensioners, and some of which would be contributions from the generation approaching pension age.

The Guardian

Last year alone, 18 states either raised the pension-contribution levels for public employees or reduced benefits for their retirees, according to Susan Urahn, the managing director of the Pew Center for the States.

The New York Times - Magazine

In the Netherlands, if a company is deemed unable to finance its long-term pension obligations, the central bank can order reduced benefits for current and future retirees to help keep the company afloat.

The New York Times

But at one high-profile event after another, in Washington and across the country, he accuses Republicans of preferring reduced benefits for old and vulnerable Americans over higher taxes on the affluent.

The New York Times

In fact, AARP data show the majority of nursing home residents are women on Medicaid, which would mean dramatically reduced benefits for older women requiring nursing home placement.

Huffington Post

The proposal in the president's fiscal year 2014 budget would have reduced benefits for future Social Security beneficiaries by an average of 1 to 2 percent over the course of their retirement.

Huffington Post

What happens if the government reduces benefits for future retirees?

The New York Times

Anything that reduces benefits for the vulnerable, or might reduce them, is difficult..

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the impact of policies or treatments, be precise about who experiences the "reduced benefit for" and by how much. Quantifiable data strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid assuming a "reduced benefit for" all members of a group without providing specific evidence. Identify distinct subgroups and their unique experiences to ensure accuracy and avoid misleading claims.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduced benefit for" primarily functions as a descriptive element, often acting as part of a larger phrase to qualify the recipient of diminished advantages. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English, as observed in the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "reduced benefit for" is used to describe a decrease in advantages or positive outcomes. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase as grammatically correct and usable in written English. Though not very common, its occurrences span across various contexts, including science, news and formal writing. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding who experiences the benefit reduction and quantify the impact whenever possible. Be aware of overgeneralizing the scope of benefit reduction to maintain accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

decreased advantage for

This alternative directly replaces "benefit" with "advantage" and "reduced" with "decreased", maintaining the original meaning.

lessened advantage for

This alternative uses "lessened" instead of "reduced", which emphasizes a smaller degree of benefit.

diminished gain for

This alternative replaces "benefit" with "gain", suggesting a reduction in profit or positive outcome.

curtailed advantage for

This alternative replaces "reduced" with "curtailed", implying a more abrupt or restricted decrease.

limited advantage for

This phrase suggests that the benefit is not completely removed, but its scope is restricted.

restricted benefit for

This alternative implies that the benefit is still present but under specific limitations.

smaller benefit for

This alternative directly indicates a decrease in the size or amount of the benefit.

compromised benefit for

Suggests that the benefit has been negatively affected and is no longer as good as it once was.

eroded benefit for

This alternative conveys a gradual decrease or wearing away of the benefit over time.

impaired advantage for

This suggests a weakening or damaging of the advantage or benefit.

FAQs

How can I use "reduced benefit for" in a sentence?

You can use "reduced benefit for" to describe situations where the positive outcomes or advantages of something have decreased. For example: "The new regulations resulted in a "reduced benefit for" small businesses."

What are some alternatives to "reduced benefit for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "decreased advantage for", "lessened advantage for", or "diminished gain for", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "reduced benefit for"?

Yes, "reduced benefit for" is grammatically correct. It follows standard English sentence structure and is commonly used in various contexts to indicate a decrease in advantages or positive outcomes.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "reduced benefit for"?

"Reduced benefit for" is appropriate in contexts where you want to discuss the negative impact of certain actions or policies on specific groups. This is often seen in discussions about healthcare, social security, and other forms of welfare.