Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(46)
Samples were recorded as negative when no oocysts or cysts were observed on the stained slide.
Of 39 sites with the highest 18F-FDG uptake, only 28.2% had an increased uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE (11 sites, 4 sites with calcification, and 7 sites without calcification), while 71.8% of the sites (28 sites, 6 sites with calcification, and 22 sites without calcification) were recorded as negative (Figure 4).
Cultures were incubated for 8 weeks before being recorded as negative.
If the bees did not respond to odour presentation in case of the unrewarded testing odours, it was recorded as negative.
Any cord formation including long cords or comma-shaped cords was recorded as positive and no cord was recorded as negative.
Weak focal staining was recorded as negative.
Similar(14)
The UIPM blocked reserve Ilia Frolov and team memeber Maksim Kustov because both appear in the McLaren report for failing tests for steroids that were fraudulently recorded as negatives.
Yes The UIPM blocked reserve Ilia Frolov and team memeber Maksim Kustov because both appear in the McLaren report for failing tests for steroids that were fraudulently recorded as negatives.
ER and PR expression were recorded as either negative or positive, while a HER2 status of 0, 1+ or 2+ was considered negative and 3+ was considered positive.
GGI values were recorded as -9% (negative value represents the increase in growth), 24%, and 10% in H2O2 group, Cu group and Cu + H2O2 group of Akpinar cultivar, respectively.
Family history was recorded as positive, negative, or unknown.
More suggestions(15)
labeled as negative
discovered as negative
recognised as negative
experienced as negative
recognized as negative
categorized as negative
labelled as negative
reduced as negative
regarded as negative
indicated as negative
recorded as 'other
recorded as viable
recorded as valid
recorded as unknown
recorded as opioid
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com