Sentence examples for record of access from inspiring English sources

Harris is right when he attributes the truly dreadful record of access at Oxford and Cambridge to the low levels of school achievement by those from poorer backgrounds, compared with the private school pupils who snap up 45% of the places on offer.

The Sarawak Report, an online publication with a remarkable record of access to leaked documents on thievery by leading Malaysian politicians, has revealed a plot, now close to realization, to use a Chinese state company as a conduit for dishonestly using public funds to plug gaping holes in 1MDB accounts.

Its protagonists struggle to find some plausible account as to why Russell Group universities – with lamentable records of access and widening participation – should feel free to charge £9,000 in tuition fees, but those universities that have made real progress in drawing young people from poorer backgrounds into higher education must settle for £6,000.

They may reflect greater recording of access to these services.

"We have a proven track record of improving access.

Now we've received some feedback from a source who boasts a long track record of good access to Taliban leaders.

The site reported how a Cambridge spokesperson said the university was "disappointed" at the "lack of understanding" of the admissions process demonstrated by the Sutton Trust's findings, adding: "We have a proven track record of improving access".

Because the record of the access is recorded to the blockchain, just like the GDPR requirements, there would be an immutable record of who was accessing the information and how the information was being used.

Yet as we celebrate the NVRA's anniversary and its proven record of increasing access to voter registration, a critical court case threatens to limit its essential protections.

Although the ultrasound may not have been performed at the first clinic visit, it was the only documented record of participants' access to abortion-related care.

Some privacy advocates and experts on the First Amendment say this is because the courts have not adequately addressed the essential difference between paper and computerized records: ease of access.