Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Competing methods are evaluated both in terms of their predictive accuracy and their ability to reconstruct the true underlying network.
This software does not "reconstruct the true genome sequence". That's just wrong.
"a deep learning technology to reconstruct the true genome sequence from HTS sequencer data with significantly greater accuracy than previous classical methods". Sure sounds like it's assembling a genome, doesn't it?
Exploiting the clustering between a sample of galaxies for which we have spectroscopic redshifts and a sample of galaxies for which the redshifts are unknown can allow us to reconstruct the true redshift distribution of the unknown sample.
Here, in a penetrating interview and sixteen essays, he marshals nuanced readings of medieval religion and philosophy to reconstruct the true character of this complicated and intellectually rich period.
These two algorithms are mathematically guaranteed to reconstruct the "true" phylogeny with high success probabilities.
Similar(43)
In this paper, we propose a new model-based approach to measuring the accuracy of a quartet-based phylogeny reconstruction method, i.e., to analyze the probability of reconstructing the "true" phylogeny.
That makes reconstructing the true "director's cut" nearly impossible.
In particular, activities in bottle T3 (which was placed between the lungs and spine) and in bottle T4 (which was placed in contact with the beef bone) were both highly overestimated by TEW while APDI reconstructed the true activity very accurately (error <1%).
For datasets with 12 taxa, the MAP topologies using our procedure reconstructed the true ones in 75% of the segments, on average (data not shown).
We also inferred the topologies of the non-recombinant fragments using minimum evolution and maximum likelihood criteria [33], reconstructing the true trees respectively in 53% and 60% of the simulations, on average (results not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com