Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
That last recommendation seemed aimed at further reducing the influence of agents.
She added that the recommendation seemed at odds with guidance from the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SCM), which advises the Scottish NHS about new drugs.
Similar(58)
And your adviser's recommendation seems like an obvious effort to do just that.
Something else? Instead, each recommendation seems to be motivated by paranoia about the inroads being made by what the report describes as lower-quality content.
But this recommendation seems to suggest that there is a shortage.
Still, Karstadt's recommendation seems quite reasonable.
In this context, Quinn's recommendation seems irresponsible.
This recommendation seems to be based on the assumption that the second program performed similarly to the first one, and that their overlap increases the reliability.
Most importantly, neither recommendation seems to be based on solid evidence.
Practically, this recommendation seems to be followed by some health professionals but not a majority of them.
The easiest and safest recommendation seems to be to choose a gadolinium agent not associated with NSF to date.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com