Sentence examples for recollection trial from inspiring English sources

As depicted in Figure 4A, multi-voxel patterns within each ROI were estimated for every recollection trial, and pairs of trials were compared by calculating the similarity between their associated voxel patterns.

Furthermore, these effects were observed only for recollection trials, not familiarity trials.

'Recollection' trials were defined as old items that were correctly recognized and endorsed with recollection (i.e., R response).

Correlations were limited to pairs of trials from the same encoding list and memory status: that is, immediate recollection trials were correlated only with other immediate recollection trials (and likewise for delayed trials).

Note that RT differences between immediate and delayed trials could not have affected the pattern similarity analyses, because for these analyses, comparisons were made among recollection trials pulled from the same day list (i.e., immediate recollection trials were paired with other immediate recollection trials, for both the same-room and different-room comparisons).

This relationship was significant even after controlling for individual differences in the number of recollection trials, t(15) = 2.81, p = 0.013.

Additionally, when the same analysis was run with familiarity trials instead of recollection trials, no differences were observed between same and different context trial pairs, ts < 1, ps > 0.2.

Alternatively, given the hypothesis that perirhinal processes support item familiarity (Eichenbaum et al., 2007), the enhanced activity for unsuccessful source recollection trials may reflect greater subsequent familiarity for these trials.

However, in the posterior HF, the recollection effect interacted with delay (left: F 1, 18) = 5.68, p = 0.028; right: F 1, 18) = 3.93, p = 0.063), such that the posterior HF was more active for immediate than delayed recollection trials (left: F(18) = 5.61, p = 0.029; right: F(18) = 5.75, p = 0.028), with no concomitant change in familiarity trials, Fs < 1.26, ps > 0.27.

Finally, Pearson's correlation was used to test the relationship between context similarity and subsequent associative recognition performance for the delayed list, and multiple linear regression was used to verify that the observed relationship was not explained by differences in the number of item recollection trials.

In the present experiment, only correctly recollected trials were included in the fMRI analysis; future studies could contrast the activity associated with correct and incorrect recollection in order to distinguish whether activity is contingent on retrieval success.