Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The episodic recollection effect is however more likely to be left-lateralized than P300 effects.
This recollection effect was stable over time in bilateral PRC, PHC, and anterior HF (all interaction Fs < 1.67, ps > 0.21).
Furthermore, although the P300 is highly sensitive to subjective probability, the parietal recollection effect may not be (Herron, Quale, & Rugg, 2003; see also Smith & Guster, 1993).
However, in the posterior HF, the recollection effect interacted with delay (left: F 1, 18) = 5.68, p = 0.028; right: F 1, 18) = 3.93, p = 0.063), such that the posterior HF was more active for immediate than delayed recollection trials (left: F(18) = 5.61, p = 0.029; right: F(18) = 5.75, p = 0.028), with no concomitant change in familiarity trials, Fs < 1.26, ps > 0.27.
Similar(56)
Imaging data showed changes in parietal subjective recollection effects in the Old-Low group and in lateral frontal objective recollection effects in both older adult groups.
There were no other reliable material-dependent source recollection effects at test.
Whole brain analysis revealed minimal differences in objective recollection effects between the spatial and temporal conditions.
Post HF may no longer show recollection effects after a delay because this specific context was forgotten over the delay.
In relation to our predictions, first, several regions exhibited source recollection effects common to words, objects and scenes, including the left ventrolateral PFC, posterior parietal cortices and hippocampi.
The current imaging results demonstrated reduced subjective recollection effects in inferior parietal and retrosplenial regions in low-functioning older adults relative to the other 2 groups.
However, recollection effects in these regions were weaker in general, consistent with previous findings that cortical activity associated with recollection of verbal materials tends to be strongest in the left hemisphere (Yonelinas et al., 2005).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com