Sentence examples for recognizing a distinction from inspiring English sources

We can work our way carefully through this issue, by recognizing a distinction between the objectivity of past events, actions and circumstances, the objectivity of the contemporary facts that resulted from these past events, and the objectivity and fixity of large historical entities.

But ultimately the law does recognize a distinction between communication and harassment.

The possibilist recognizes a distinction between existing and actually existing that requires a bloated ontology.

Many philosophers recognize a distinction between two kinds of mental events.

A possible objection to what I have outlined might be that I have simply recognized a distinction between two modes of memory: implicit memory and explicit memory.

And so we should recognize a distinction between reductive and non-reductive forms of representationalism or intentionalism about consciousness (Chalmers 2004).

Elsewhere still Clifford seems not to recognize a distinction between epistemic and moral obligations at all (see Van Inwagen 1996, Haack 1997, Wood 2002, and Zamulinski 2002 for further discussion of Clifford).

However, we should recognize a distinction between those whose envisioned naturalistic explanation would require underlying forms of necessity and impossibility stronger that that pertaining to laws of nature generally — such as either conceptual or 'metaphysical' necessity — and those who see the link between explanans and explanandum as simply one of natural scientific law.

In my family, we've never recognized a distinction between happiness and the handling of books.

Note that I do not recognize a distinction between subtle caudal deflection of the fibula as in states "a" and "b" of Livezey and Zusi ([64]: character 2195), as there is not a strong distinction between the morphology of taxa possessing either of these two character states, nor a clear morphological gap separating the states.

Tinbergen found a way to integrate differing views, recognizing a core distinction among questions that focussed on proximate and those that focussed on ultimate explanations (Tinbergen 1963).