recognize with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recognize with" is not correct or usable in written English.
It does not have a clear meaning when used in this context. If you mean to denote understanding or agreement with an idea or sentiment, you can use the phrase "recognize" alone, or "agree with". For example, "I recognize the importance of communication in relationships" or "I agree with your assessment of the situation".

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

You recognize, with a kind of terrible joy, all that you haven't read and that you would like to read.

The New Yorker

The feelings they do recognize with excruciating clarity are the fear and shame of discovery and certain punishment.

The New York Times

It would show that the country has not entirely lost its ability to recognize, with grace and gratitude, the great potential in the immigrants among us.

The New York Times

Jacob sings with a maudlin intensity that anyone who has spent time in a piano bar will recognize with a mixture of amusement, embarrassment and fascination.

The New York Times

He could recognize, with uncanny speed and accuracy, every bone from every Mauritian bird, even when the specimen was smaller than a toothpick.

The New Yorker

Though his photograph rarely appeared in the government-friendly press, the man known by his initials, J. B. J., was easy to recognize with his long, somber face, exaggerated features and white whiskers.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

His contributions were recognized with numerous awards.

The New York Times

Mrs. Callner Miller's dedication was recognized with an honorary fellowship from the Technion in 1984.

The New York Times

At the agency's annual meeting several months ago, Andy was recognized with the Founder's Award.

The New York Times

The Times is proud to be recognized with the magazine industry's greatest honor.

The New Yorker

He is able to do simple addition, since he recognizes, with relative ease, numbers.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "recognize with" in formal writing. Instead, use "recognize" followed by the object of recognition or rephrase to use alternatives like "acknowledge" or "understand".

Common error

A common mistake is adding "with" after "recognize". This is generally ungrammatical. Ensure that "recognize" is followed directly by the object being recognized or use a different verb that correctly incorporates "with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "recognize with" is typically intended to express acknowledgement or understanding, but it is grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI highlights that it lacks clear meaning and advises against its usage. It often attempts to link the act of recognition to something else, but does so improperly.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

48%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "recognize with" appears frequently across various sources, as noted by Ludwig, but it is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. This phrase attempts to link the act of recognition to another element, but more appropriate alternatives like simply using "recognize", or rewording the sentence to incorporate verbs such as "acknowledge", "understand", or "identify" are recommended. Despite its relatively common occurrence, avoiding "recognize with" in formal or professional writing is advisable to maintain grammatical correctness and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

recognize

Omits the preposition "with", correcting the grammatical structure while retaining the core meaning of acknowledgment.

acknowledge

Replaces "recognize" with a synonym that also implies acceptance or awareness, without needing "with".

identify

Substitutes "recognize" with a term focusing on pinpointing or establishing something, again without "with".

discern

Uses a more formal synonym of "recognize", emphasizing the ability to perceive or distinguish something.

realize

Shifts the focus to understanding or becoming aware of something, a different nuance of recognition.

appreciate

Changes the meaning slightly to valuing or understanding the significance of something, removing direct recognition.

understand

Replaces "recognize" to highlight the comprehension or grasp of a concept or situation.

be aware of

Focuses on the state of being conscious or informed about something, a broader sense of recognition.

perceive

Highlights the act of becoming aware through the senses, offering a specific type of recognition.

detect

Emphasizes discovering or noticing something, often something not immediately obvious.

FAQs

How can I properly use the word "recognize" in a sentence?

Use "recognize" followed directly by what you are acknowledging or identifying. For example, "I recognize the importance of this issue." Avoid adding "with" after "recognize".

What are some alternatives to using "recognize"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "acknowledge", "identify", "understand", or "realize".

Is it grammatically correct to say "recognize with"?

No, "recognize with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use "recognize" alone or choose a different verb that fits the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "recognize" and "recognize with" (even if the second one is wrong)?

While "recognize" means to identify something or acknowledge its existence, "recognize with" doesn't have a clear grammatical meaning in standard English. So, while you may encounter the phrase, it is generally advisable to use "recognize" without the "with".