Sentence examples for recognition table from inspiring English sources

After this the process uses a decision-making lattice to determine the soundness of the recognition (Table 6; Fig. 6).

Fig. 2 Overview of the developed system for MCP joint recognition Table 2 Specification of the developed system Camera PointGrey FL3-U3-13E4C-C [31]   Image size 1280 × 960 pixels Lens μ-tron 0420   Focal length 15 mm Light source Ambient light.

On average, observers performed about 14 fixations per trial during learning and 5 fixations during recognition (Table 1).

In contrast, the remaining FBX loci without the hallmarks of pseudogenization were enriched in coding regions for known recruitment modules (Fischer's exact test, p<0.05), including 10 well-characterized interaction domains that could participate in target recognition (Table S6).

Also linking AtWAKL10 to early defense responses is the presence of a number of calcium transporting and sensing molecules in the ECGG50 since calcium is an important second messenger in plant defense and rapid increases in cytosolic calcium concentrations are required for activation of downstream defense signaling following pathogen recognition (Table S1) [56].

Salinas that encoded domains characteristic of proteins involved in pathogen recognition (Table S2).

In the third one, none of the filters were considered for recognition (Tables 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).

A 32-bp region TGC-rich sequence is recognized by PhaR in the phaP promoter region, while the phaR promoter region included only an 8-bp recognition sequence (Table 1) (Potter and Steinbuchel 2005).

To construct hyq merodiploid transcriptional reporter strains, a 1.8 kbp fragment carrying the E. coli uidA+ coding sequence was amplified by PCR using synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide primers extended with 6 bp SalI endonuclease recognition sequences (Table 1).

Open reading frames were amplified from T. brucei (strain 927) genomic DNA by PCR using primers containing AttB1 and AttB2 recognition sequences (Table S1) positioned relative to the ORF as previously described [31].

Most importantly, performance at delayed testing three days later in the Natural, Impoverished, Alternate and Recognition conditions (Table 1) was also not different between groups allowed to sleep (RS) or not (TSD) on the first post-training night (ps>0.78).