Sentence examples for recognition score from inspiring English sources

The sum of words of trials 2 5, the delayed recall trial, and the recognition score p(A) (Forrester and Geffen, 1991) were the dependent variables.

In a speech recognition score (SRS) test, changing the presentation level had the strongest effect on sentence recognition, followed by the presence of disyllabic words.

Finally, the feedback procedure by the recognition score from an optical character recognition (OCR) module is used to improve the performance of text segmentation.

Conclusions: Cochlear implantation should be considered for prelingually hearing impaired children demonstrating marginal benefit from hearing aids, with a speech recognition score less than 30% on open set materials, in order to improve their speech discrimination skills.

Subjects: Seven prelingually deafened children demonstrating marginal benefit from conventional amplification prior to implantation with a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant, served as subjects for the speech perception assessment (a speech recognition score less than 30% defines marginal benefit from acoustic amplification on open set materials).

The experiments show promising improvement especially for the data with low initial recognition score.

Mean bisyllabic word and sentence recognition scores were 74% and 80%, respectively.

Higher speech recognition scores with the simultaneous strategy were generally associated with lower levels of electrical-field interaction.

There was no statistically significant difference in sentences' recognition scores and difficulty scores obtained with the SHHI, for all types of implants.

Speech recognition scores were correlated with measured electrical-field interaction for the strategy which used simultaneous stimulation but not the strategy which used sequential stimulation.

Electrical-field interaction accounted for as much as 70% of the variance in speech recognition scores, suggesting that electrical-field interaction is a significant contributor to the variability found across patients who use simultaneous strategies.