Sentence examples for recognition of stimuli from inspiring English sources

To further investigate manifestations of episodic memory impairments in adolescents, we examined the role of encoding on recognition of stimuli in conditions designed to emphasize their item-specific versus relational characteristics in a group of 12 18 year olds with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

The findings suggest that the left and right MTL structures may contribute differentially to the processes involved in the recognition of stimuli and that these differential activities may depend on the encoding strategies formed by the two factors of relational and self-performed processes.

From this it is concluded that amphetamine does not cause a narrowing of attention and that the disruptive effect of amphetamine on the "go-no go" successive discrimination task already reported is due to a loss of response inhibition rather than to difficulties in the recognition of stimuli presented without a comparison stimulus.

First, patients with schizophrenia display increased false alarm rates (recognition of stimuli that were not presented in the learning context), which suggest that context information imposes a weaker than normal constraint on retrieval [11], [12].

While recognition of stimuli taken under identical viewing conditions can be solved by image matching, rotation in depth which occurs frequently under natural viewing conditions at least diminishes the applicability of similar compensatory strategies.

Results suggest that conscious recognition of stimuli is not necessary for activation of cognitive processing.

While some studies on prosopagnosia found little or no evidence for an impairment of visual recognition of stimulus categories other than faces [25], [26], recent findings argue in favor of prosopagnosia as a more general impairment of configural or holistic processing.

This model has been used previously to illustrate several phenomena in perception; such as perceptual learning, repetition suppression, and the recognition of stimulus streams with deep hierarchical structure (Friston & Kiebel, 2009; Kiebel, Daunizeau, & Friston, 2008).

This selective impairment can be interpreted as evidence that fornix lesions impair recognition memory of stimuli that provide few and/or confusing retrieval cues.

Results: Recall and recognition of generated stimuli were significantly higher than provided stimuli across testing sessions.

The first is that the recognition test must contain both novel and familiar stimuli to make it possible to behaviourally confirm the recognition of repeated stimuli, i.e., the test cannot solely contain novel stimuli.