Sentence examples for recognition of items from inspiring English sources

The logarithmic relationship between memory set size and hybrid search RT holds for large memory set sizes of 100 (Wolfe, 2012a) or even 500 specific items (Wolfe, Boettcher, Josephs, Cunningham, & Drew, 2015) and appears to be based on the recognition of items as targets rather than a more basic feeling of 'familiarity' (Wolfe, Boettcher, Josephs, Cunningham, & Drew, 2015).

In a long version of this experiment, recognition of items as old and new was similarly affected by group responses.

These findings indicate that differential effects of social conformity on recognition of items as old and new occur in situations with an intermediate level of group pressure.

Previous studies have shown that the opinion of confederates in a group influences recognition memory, but inconsistent results have been obtained concerning the question of whether recognition of items as old and new are affected similarly, possibly because only one or two confederates are present during the recognition phase.

Navigation also involves recognition of items, rather than recall, as each step provides visual and contextual feedback, as well as a reminder of the subsequent steps that may be required (Teevan et al., 2004).

To explore the hypothesis of the previously evidenced role of pleasure in decision making might depend on a simple recognition of items by the participants, in Experiment 3, we presented the same items twice in order to verify whether participants would select behaviors that they had previously preferred.

In the three-way ANOVA across both versions, we observed a main effect of "item type", indicating that detection of new items was better than recognition of old items; in the short version, the rate of correct rejections was not significantly affected by group opinion as long as at least one out of four confederates gave a correct responses.

These results suggest that previous findings that social conformity affects detection of new items stronger than recognition of old items [19] cannot be easily generalized to real-world conditions.

Several studies have compared the neural activity that accompanies genuine recognition of studied items and false recognition of novel items (e.g., [ 82, 94, 95]).

A likely possibility is that our pilot testing overcame any general advantage for recognition of boundary items, and perhaps through unlucky selection converged on items that ran strictly counter to it.

We did not assess subsequent recognition of new items presented in the test phase making it difficult to determine whether these items were encoded into memory.