Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The official recognition of HPV infection as a necessary cause of cervical cancer [ 4] has generated an interest in the use of HPV testing for screening and prevention efforts [ 5].
Assessment of potential interactions of chemicals with HPV was limited by delayed recognition of HPV as a carcinogen.
Analysis of the vaccine-induced tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells showed that a large proportion of these cells produced interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) as well as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) upon recognition of HPV antigen.
Similar(57)
Together these data suggest that HPVs dampen but do not block PRR signaling, and imply that the attraction of innate immune cells to the site of HPV infection, the subsequent initiation of adaptive immunity as well as the recognition of HPV-infected KCs is slowed down but not prevented.
Similar considerations apply to the recognition of HPVs as the cause of cervical cancer and to the development of a vaccine that is now on its way to prevent the disease both in the North and the South.
Recognition of HR HPV at the individual type level may be valuable in clinical management of HR HPV-positive women.
Given the growing recognition of oral HPV infection as a risk factor for oral cancers, we elected to examine a priori the potential biases introduced by sampling interval, rather than to assume the cervical standard of a six-month sampling interval.
This lack of recognition of the HPV-11 L1 NLS+ VLPs is of great concern because these VLPs most closely resemble the actual virus: the implications of this will be discussed later.
The general recognition of the term HPV was low (29.7%, 33/111).
The sequence variation within the SPF-10 primers allows the recognition of these different HPV genotypes, except for types 68 and 73, as their interprimer regions are identical and cannot be distinguished by this test.
There are over 100 strains of HPV.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com