A classification should not only be recognition of disorders, with a minimalist description of some characteristic traits of each disorder.
Recognition of disorders in vignettes did not improve, but there was a very high recognition at pre-test, limiting the scope for improvement.
Case definition and recognition of disorders varies across states or has variable interpretations; and above all the cultural components of what constitutes a disorder remain an important issue.
For clinicians, the early recognition of disorders with a relatively good prognosis would warrant less intensive treatment and, as such, a minor burden of side effects.
Such testing accuracy may complement simple pain ratings, particularly in the work with early recognition of disorders, and possibly for planning further clinical examination and intervention.
Relative to controls, people who did the course showed better recognition of disorders from case descriptions, decreased social distance towards people with mental disorders, became more like health professionals in their beliefs about what treatments are likely to be helpful, had greater confidence in providing help to someone, and were more likely to actually provide help.
Two randomised controlled trials of this course, one in a work place environment [ 20] and the other with members of the public in a rural area [ 8], have shown benefits of the training: better recognition of disorders, changes in beliefs about treatment to be more like those of professionals, decreased social distance, increased confidence in providing help, and increase in actual help provided.
We found the Mood Disorder Questionnaire to be a feasible method for improving recognition of bipolar disorder, which has clearly been a problem.
The Mood Disorder Questionnaire seems to be a feasible method for improving the recognition of bipolar disorder.
The Mood Disorder Questionnaire appears to be a feasible method for improving the recognition of bipolar disorder.
