Correct recognition was lower in this study than in some others which have used a similar methodology [ 1].
However, this study did not contain any behavioural outcome measures; this conclusion was based on the observation that recognition was lower for low fear (and disgust).
The risk for hyposmia of recognition was lower in women (OR=0.79) and higher in subjects reporting a loss of smell history for over 1 week (OR=1.23); and it was associated with older age (>70 years old), a lower educational level, and a worse smell self-perception.
If the value of distance is smaller, the score is higher, namely, the probability of miss-recognition is lower.
Also, the programmable estimated recognition liability is lower, because of ambient noise detected by the microphone - the microphone is not able to catch the entire command.
The ESniff MMSE method generally shows significant performance improvements for both Set B and Set C, but the recognition accuracy is lower for Set A except when M = 4.
From the comparison above, we can know that the time complexity of the hybrid recognition is obviously lower than the classical SVM.
The few studies that have used spontaneous facial expressions indicate that recognition is typically lower than for posed photographs (for a summary see [18]).
From the results, we can find that the conclusion we got from NLPR's emotional corpus is also suitable for Belfast Naturalistic Database, however, most of the emotion recognition rates are lower than that from NLPR's corpus.
Despite this recommendation, recognition of delirium in geriatric patients by emergency physicians (EPs) is lower than 33%[12]],[17]-[19] ,[17]-[19]
