Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(37)
GME pre-treatment (800 mg/kg, p.o). reversed the effect of scopolamine in mice, evident by significant decrease (p <0.05) in the transfer latency time and increase in object recognition index in PSA and NOR, respectively.
NonTg mice spent more time exploring the novel object as indicated by a recognition index of >0.5 (Figure 2).
The amount of time animals spend exploring the novel object is noted and the recognition index is generated.
Notably, the object recognition index did not significantly differ between neonatal SAL- and DEX-treated rats in Group B [F 1,12) = 0.4, p = 0.56] (Figure 7B).
Object recognition was investigated after one hour because the recognition index of our control mice was significantly decreased after this time, thus reducing the sensitivity of the test.
Following a 10 min, 24 h or 48 h delay, one of the familiar objects was replaced by a novel object and the time spent exploring the novel object (recognition index) was measured.
Similar(23)
Indeed, during the last 30 years, the rational model of judgment has been overtaken by behavioral psychology discoveries suggesting that clinicians, like others, are prone to cognitive biases (such as pattern recognition, indexing keys or gist) leading to systematic and predictable errors [17].
In object recognition, comparison of recognition indexes to chance was performed using univariate t-tests.
To determine if either group successfully discriminated novel from familiar objects, we conducted one sample t tests based on the cumulative D1 recognition indices.
At 13 months of age, McGill transgenic heterozygote and homozygote rats showed significant impairments in object recognition, with recognition indices close to chance levels, as well as deficits in location memory, compared to non-transgenic animals.
To determine if groups successfully discriminated novel from familiar objects, one sample t-tests were conducted using the cumulative recognition indices (D1 and D2) from the completion of test session (e.g. Experiments 1a and 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com