The phrase "recognition databases" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to databases that contain information or data used for recognition purposes. Example: The police department uses recognition databases to match fingerprints of suspects with those in the database to identify potential perpetrators of crimes.
Multiple attempts have been made to set up facial recognition databases in the past, both in the US and the UK, causing rows over privacy and ethics.
Proponents of facial recognition databases cite the ability to catch both criminals and terrorists through CCTV cameras and image databases, as Stammer was.
The reason state governments currently keep detailed facial recognition databases from driver's licenses, said Lynch, is to stymie identity theft and other crimes.
The experimental results on six face recognition databases and two object recognition databases demonstrate that the proposed methods outperform the competitors used in the experiments.
The method is evaluated on three widely used face recognition databases: AR, FERET and LFW, with the very popular LBP operator and some of its extensions.
With half of all U.S. adults already in police facial recognition databases and the 2018 midterm election season upon us, the issue of political data mining feels urgent to Black activists.
That lawsuit was filed by Jennifer Lynch, senior staff attorney at the EFF, who says that the FBI's facial recognition database is hardly the only one.
A committee of MPs has condemned police for continuing to upload custody photographs, including of people never charged, to a face recognition database, despite a high court judgement that ruled the practice was unlawful.
Civil liberty groups point out there is no statutory basis for the creation of a national number plate recognition database, under which data about drivers' movements is retained for at least two years.
The FBI's own statistics suggest that one out of every seven searches of its facial recognition database fails to turn up a correct match, meaning the software occasionally produces 50 "potential" matches who are all "innocent", the report said.
"I believe that we have a fundamental right to privacy, and that means people should have the ability to choose whether or not they'll be enrolled in a commercial facial recognition database," he said.
