recognised with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recognised with" is not correct in standard English usage.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to convey that someone has received an award or acknowledgment. Example: "She was recognised with the Employee of the Month award for her outstanding performance."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Volunteers are recognised with a sign along the road they adopt.

The Guardian

There was an urgent need to get the land demarcated and recognised with legal protection.

The Guardian

Matthew Pinsent, Britain's other Olympic hero, is recognised with a knighthood.

The Guardian - Sport

Smith said: "I'm sincerely thankful and humbled to be recognised with such an honour.

The Guardian

It's good that he is to be recognised with a Commons unveiling.

The Guardian - Opinion

The work was recognised with a Pulitzer prize in April 2014.

The Guardian

In 2006 it was recognised with the silver award in the news and current affairs category.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

But because symbols can be powerful, the White Helmets should be recognised with this award.

The Guardian - Opinion

Tennessee is the second US state after California to be recognised with an element.

The Guardian

Cluster analysis demonstrates that pain and emotion are recognised with a high degree of specificity.

PAIN®

As they recognised with Ferguson, the success flowed from the manager, not the other way around.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer "recognized as" or "awarded" to ensure grammatical correctness in formal writing. Avoid "recognised with".

Common error

Avoid using "recognised with" when describing achievements or awards. This phrasing is grammatically questionable. Instead, use "recognized as" or "awarded" to maintain clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "recognised with" functions as a verb phrase, often used to describe the act of acknowledging someone through a specific means, such as an award. However, according to Ludwig AI, its usage is considered grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

36%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "recognised with" is frequently encountered, particularly in news and scientific sources, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as such, recommending alternatives like "recognized as" or "awarded". To maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity, especially in formal writing, it's best to opt for these more standard alternatives. Remember that although it can be found frequently in different sources, it is advisable to avoid this construction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

recognized as

This alternative replaces the preposition "with" with "as", resulting in a more grammatically standard phrasing.

awarded

This option replaces the entire phrase with a single verb that means 'given an award'.

honored with

This phrase is a more formal alternative, emphasizing the esteem associated with the recognition.

presented with

This alternative suggests the act of formally giving something to someone, such as an award or title.

given

This option uses a simple verb to denote that something was granted or bestowed.

bestowed upon

A more formal alternative that suggests a significant honor or gift being conferred.

acknowledged through

This alternative focuses on the method or means by which recognition is given.

credited with

This version highlights the source or reason behind the recognition.

distinguished by

This alternative signifies that someone or something is marked or set apart by a particular quality.

celebrated for

This option emphasizes the celebratory aspect of the recognition, highlighting what is being praised.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say someone received an award?

Instead of saying someone was "recognised with" an award, it's better to say they were "recognized as" a recipient, "awarded" the prize, or "honored with" the distinction.

Is "recognised with" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, "recognised with" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Alternatives like "recognized as" or "awarded" are preferred.

How can I use "recognize" correctly in a sentence about achievements?

When talking about achievements, use "recognize" with "as", as in "She was "recognized as" an innovator in her field". Avoid using "with" in this context.

What are some alternatives to "recognised with" that sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "honored with", "bestowed upon", or "presented with" instead of "recognised with".